Thursday, April 13, 2006

Thesis Writing

For more than a quarter century of academic career, I have noticed that higher education students are still not clear on the process of developing a thesis, and how they can go about writing their thesis in a way that make their propositions more tangible.
Therefore, I thought I should take the time to contribute few ideas that may help my MBA and PhD students as well as others to grasp both the spirit and the skills to write good dissertations. The following represent both my own opinion as well as the guidelines of the School of Business at Harvard University:

  • Begin with something unresolved. Some question about which you are truly curious. Make clear to yourself and your readers the unresolved question that you set out to resolve. This is your governing question, the question that directs the structure of your thesis project. Bear in mind that it takes a lot of work – reading, talking with people, thinking – to generate and focus your governing question.

  • Show your readers what leads you to pose your question. Your governing question derives from competing observations, i.e., observations that appear to you to be in tension with one another and to indicate an apparent puzzle, problem, discrepancy, oversight, mystery, contradiction, or surprise. In the introduction to your piece, let your readers know how what you observe leads you to ask the question you ask.

  • Identify your subordinate question. Just as the thesis as a whole is a response to a governing question, each chapter, each section, and each paragraph of the thesis is a response to a subordinate question. Subordinate questions are the questions you will need to address or resolve on the way to addressing your governing question.

  • Free-write. Write brief, uncensored pieces to loosen your mind. While it is true that in our final product ideas need to be in the form of linear logic so that others can follow our thinking, we need to draw upon our associative logic in the creative process. Associative logic is the logic of dreams, of those times when our mind is free to wander (e.g., just before falling asleep, in the shower, while driving), and of those generative, free-flowing conversations that lead us seemingly – yet not entirely – far afield from where we started. Consequently, if we follow our mind’s wanderings and associations far enough, they often lead to something creative and useful. The following leads may help explain my point:


  • What leads me to pose that question is ….

  • I want to know …

  • I want to figure out how …

  • I have a hunch that …

  • Save often. Just as you need to save often when you’re working on a computer, you need to save often (in your brain) when you’re reading and studying. The way to save your thoughts is to jot them down. Otherwise your ideas may get deleted, especially if you have a power surge (get caught up in another idea) or a crash (fall asleep. Thought that are not written down will be most likely be deleted and lost. Jot down even brief notes as some notes are better than no notes.

  • Create two thesis journals or folders. One on your computer (i.e., a folder for memos) as well as one for hand-written entries (i.e., a notebook, big envelope, manila folder, or big piece of paper on the wall) to record thesis thoughts that come to you in moments when you’re not at the computer. Great ideas don’t always come at appropriate or convenient times, so you have to log them in as they arrive.

  • Let your reader in on your reasoning. Let your reader know what you want him or her to take away from or learn from a chapter and from your thesis as a whole. Don’t just present data. Show your reader how you want him or her to make sense of the data. Show your reader the inference you make, the things you see as you read between the lines.

  • Make a point. Thesis writers usually rely on summarizing, describing, narrating, and categorizing in order to make a point. While an elegant and clarifying summary, or a careful and sensitive description, or a well-chosen and illustrative narrative, or a new and intriguing categorization may be a contribution to your field, chances are you will be expected to develop some sort of argument or point, that is, to use your summary, description, narrative, or categorization in the service of an analytic response to some unresolved question or problem.

  • Reckon with the complexity of your question. You don’t necessarily need to resolve your question completely. Sometimes it is enough to talk clearly about how and why things are complex rather than to clear up the complexity.

  • Show the subtleties of your thinking. Many students rely on variations of “and” to connect their ideas: “and”; “in addition”; “also”; “another example”; “later”; “plus”; “besides”; “yet another thing.” Developing a connection between your ideas help clarify them to the reader. Use expression like “even though”; “despite”; “consequently”; “as a result” to connect your sentences.

  • Use chapter titles and subheads as important signposts for your reader and as ways of challenging yourself to summarize your thoughts. To name is to know.

  • Accept that anxiety and anxiety-management are part of the writing process. Some doctoral students have stated that about 80% of the time and energy involved in writing a dissertation goes to anxiety management. You cannot wait until you are not afraid or not anxious to begin writing. You need to find ways to write even when you’re anxious. Writing in your thesis journal about your fear or anxiety can be a way of keeping yourself company in your fear, discovering what your fear is about, letting the fear be there without letting it stip you from doing what you need to do.

  • Take frequent breaks. To sustain your focus and concentration, you need to pace yourself. Pacing requires well-timed breaks. Take a break before you get to the “breading point”, that is, the point at which you are so exhausted that you collapse or so frustrated that you avoid getting back to the task.

  • Think of your work in terms of relationship, a process of continually connecting and re-connecting. Things get out of perspective when they fall out of relationship: we cannot tell how big or small things are unless we see them in relation to something else. To keep your work in perspective, or to bring your thesis back to scale once you’ve lost perspective, try to stay in relation with, i.e.., connected with:


  • Your curiosity and your caring (also known as your interest, your passion, your desire to understand or to know) by remembering what drew you to your question.

  • Your question: by free-writing, being playful with ideas.

  • Your instructors and/or supervisors: by talking with them about your ideas and about your experience of trying to write.

  • Negotiate with yourself. When you seem to be sabotaging your own efforts to do what you intend, listen for internal voices that express you competing needs, desires and fears. I am talking here about you becoming sometimes divided between you intention to sit and write, and your wish to take time off for recreation or leisure time.

Monday, April 10, 2006

Criteria for Evaluating E-Information

1. What can the URL tell you?
1. Before you leave the list of search results -- before you click and get interested in anything written on the page -- glean all you can from the URLs of each page.
2. Then choose pages most likely to be reliable and authenticated.

2. Scan the perimeter of the page, looking for answers to these questions:

1. Look for links that say "About us," "Philosophy," "Background," "Biography," "Who am I," etc.

2. If you cannot find any links like these, you can often find this kind of information if you Truncate
INSTRUCTIONS for Truncating back a URL: In the top Location Box, delete the end characters of the URL stopping just before each / (leave the slash). Press enter to see if you can see more about the author or the origins/nature of the site providing the page.
Continue this process, one slash (/) at a time, until you reach the first single / which is preceded by the domain name portion. This is the page's server or "publisher."
3. Look for the date "last updated" - usually at the bottom of a web page.
Check the date on all the pages on the site.
Do not rely on a date given in IE's FileProperties or Netscape/Mozilla's ViewPage Info displays. These dates can be automatically kept current and are useless in critical evaluation.


(3. Look for indicators of quality information:

1. Look for a link called "links," "additional sites," "related links," etc.
2. In the text, if you see little footnote numbers or links that might refer to documentation, take the time to explore them.
What kinds of publications or sites are they? Reputable? Scholarly?
Are they real? On the web (where no publisher is editing most pages), it is possible to create totally fake references.
3. Look at the publisher of the page (first part of the URL).
Expect a journal article, newspaper article, and some other publications that are recent to come from the original publisher IF the publication is available on the web.
Look at the bottom of such articles for copyright information or permissions to reproduce.

4. What do others say?

1. Find out what other web pages link to this page.
a. Use
alexa.com URL information:
Simply paste the url into alexa.com's search box.
You will see, depending on the volume of traffic to the page:

  1. Traffic rank
  2. Subjective reviews
  3. "Site statistics" including some page history, sites that link to the page
  4. Contact/ownership info for the domain name
  5. A link to the Internet archive of website history "Wayback Machine"
b. Do a link: search in Google, Yahoo!, or another search engine where this can be done.
INSTRUCTIONS for doing a link: search in Google or Yahoo!:
1. Copy the URL of the page you are investigating (Ctrl+C in Windows).
2. Go to the search engine site, and type link: in the search box.
3. Paste the URL of the investigated site into the search box immediately following link: (no space after the colon).
The pages listed all contain one or more links to the page you are looking for.
If you find no links, try a shorter portion of the URL, stopping after each /.
2. Look the page up in a reputable
directory that evaluates its contents (Librarians' Index, Infomine, About.com, AcademicInfo, or a specialized directory you trust).

5. Does it all add up?

1. Step back and think about all you have learned about the page. Listen to your gut reaction. Think about why the page was created, the intentions of its author(s).
If you have doubts, ask your instructor or come to one of the library reference desks and ask for advice.
2. Be sensitive to the possibility that you are the victim of irony, spoof, fraud, or other falsehood.
3. Ask yourself if the web is truly the best place to find resources for the research you are doing.


WHY? Rationale for Evaluating What You Find on the Web
The World Wide Web can be a great place to accomplish research on many topics. But putting documents or pages on the web is easy, cheap or free, unregulated, and unmonitored (at least in the USA). There is a famous Steiner cartoon published in the New Yorker (July 5, 1993) with two dogs sitting before a terminal looking at a computer screen; one says to the other "On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog." The great wealth that the Internet has brought to so much of society is the ability for people to express themselves, find one another, exchange ideas, discover possible peers worldwide they never would have otherwise met, and, through hypertext links in web pages, suggest so many other people's ideas and personalities to anyone who comes and clicks. There are some real "dogs" out there, but there's also great treasure.
Therein lies the rationale for evaluating carefully whatever you find on the Web. The burden is on you - the reader - to establish the validity, authorship, timeliness, and integrity of what you find. Documents can easily be copied and falsified or copied with omissions and errors -- intentional or accidental. In the general World Wide Web there are no editors (unlike most print publications) to proofread and "send it back" or "reject it" until it meets the standards of a publishing house's reputation. Most pages found in general search engines for the web are self-published or published by businesses small and large with motives to get you to buy something or believe a point of view. Even within university and library web sites, there can be many pages that the institution does not try to oversee. The web needs to be free like that!! And you, if you want to use it for serious research, need to cultivate the habit of healthy skepticism, of questioning everything you find with critical thinking.


(More About Evaluating Web Sources

  1. Evaluating Information Found on the Internet <http://www.library.jhu.edu/researchhelp/general/evaluating/> An excellent series of pages on this subject (from the Milton Library at Johns Hopkins University).

  2. Critical Evaluation of Resources <http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Evaluation.html>A broader, more theoretical look at the criteria and importance of evaluating all types of resources (also from the UC Berkeley Teaching Library).

  3. For annotated descriptions of many other good guides to evaluating web pages, search the subject "Evaluation of Internet Resources" in the Librarians' Index to the Internet <http://lii.org>.